The opening entry in the 1660 book states “The quilk day the bonitmaker
Craft of Dundie, Reprentive, takine to consideratione the loss and want of
their ould and antient bouck of their acks and kiper on ther measters neams
in Register, by the storme and intakine of our forsaid brugh by the Inglisis, upon
the first of September in anno a thousand six houndreth fiftie ane His now creat
and made this present bouck in stead and place thereof, to contean and pres-ve
our ould and antient acks and statutes that was continit in that former lost bouck
by our wyse antesstours, and quhat we in our tymes can think expedient and
profitable, or the neirist way for the honour of God and our own weill. And alsu
for all thos that schall by the providence of God, sucsed to our bonitmaker crof
of dindie in all tyms heirafter”
In modern English this translates to “Today, the whole Bonnetmaker Craft of
Dundee considered the loss and need for their old Book of Acts, and records of
the names of their registered Masters, by the storming and taking of the Burgh
by the English on the 1st September 1651. We now create this present book in
it’s place to contain and preserve the Acts and Statutes, made by our wise ancestors,
which were in the old Book, along with those that we think expedient
and to our benefit, in the best way to honour God and ourselves. Also for all those
who by the grace of God shall follow us in the Bonnetmaker Craft of Dundee
hereafter.”
This is the only ‘Lockit Book of any of the Trades in which we find proof that it
was General Monck who was responsible for the loss of an earlier book.
However the Bonnetmakers do have two of their ‘Seals of Cause’. These were
parchments granted by the burgh allowing the Bonnetmakers to have and elect
a Deacon, and to elect senior Masters of the Craft, to frame Acts, Statutes and
Ordinances for the governing of the Craft and for the protection of its members.
The first of the seals of cause is dated 1496, proving that the Trade was organising
itself by that date, although it may well have been in existence much earlier.
A second Seal of Cause in the Trade’s possession is dated 1525. A modern translation
of both these Charters is among the records of the Trade held in the office
of the Clerk. The Patron Saint of the craft is the Irish Saint St. Bride and the seals
of cause stipulate that the Deacon is to be elected on St. Bride’s Day. Another
unusual part of the Seals of Cause is that it specifically included women in the
Craft. However women were merely said to “occupy the Craft” whereas men were
“Masters”.
Like the other Crafts, the Trade controlled the number of Masters by limiting them
to have only one apprentice at a time, and even forbidding any apprentices for a
number of years when the number of Masters was too great. In this way sufficient
work was maintained for each master and the laws of supply and demand ensured
that a good price was got for each bonnet.
Dundee was the first Scottish Burgh to have a Bonnetmaker Craft. This
is probably because the first bonnets were derived from those worn by
clergymen coming from Europe. Dundee was the second burgh of Scotland
and its trading and educational links with Europe made it very important and
wealthy. Many merchants and nobles sent their sons to the University of Leydon
to finish their education.
It is very likely therefore, that they were copied from the priests coming from from
Europe, (who wore bonnets which were small versions of what were to become
Dundee bonnets). George Wishart the martyr and John Knox, were frequent travellers
to Europe, and wore similar bonnets.
Bonnetmakers plied their Trade from outside their houses.
Sadly no Dundee bonnet exists today and there are no accurate descriptions.
However we do know something about these bonnets. They were made of knitted
wool, and graded as “gryt or muckle”, using 18 ounces of wool, “Mangrel”, meaning
mongrel, “lang middlin”, down to “meikle” of as little as six ounces weight and
all were knitted in a circular fashion.The knitter wore a broad leather belt with a
slot in it through which a short post would be inserted. It was round this post that
the bonnet was knitted.
Either way they were very heavy indeed and the larger ones would have been
wide enough to hang down over the ears and back of the neck in very bad
weather. A man would put his bonnet on in the morning along with his trousers
and did not take it off again until he went to bed at night. They would be handed
down from father to son, and the original saying to a young man was “You’ll never
fill your fathers bunnet”. It was not until much later that the word shoes, replaced
bonnet.
Dundee bonnets were black, usually worn by the middle classes, or blue, for the
working classes. A few bonnets were made in russet colour. Whatever else we
do know, it is certain that the “toorie” in black, blue or red was developed in
Dundee. Blue bonnets became associated with the marauding folk from the highlands,
and so were less popular in the Burgh..When the Highland Regiments
were raised the bonnets were associated with soldiers, the famous “Blue bonnets
over the Border.” By the 1700’s, however these were mostly made in Stewarton,
but were known in Dundee as ‘Glasgow Bonnets’.
A likely reason why there are no Dundee bonnets left is because they were not
worn by the Nobles, but only by the working classes. They were handed down
from father to son until they literally fell to pieces. No one would think it necessary
to keep something like that for posterity. However the National Museum of Scotland
owns one or two early bonnets and we assume that they were taken from a
similar style as the Dundee bonnet. Some further idea of what a Dundee Bonnet
looked like can be gleaned fronm old portraits and paintings. Often in these paintings
and old retainer can be seen in the background wearing a bonnet. Although
the servant is incidental in the main picture, he presents a fair idea of the clothing
worn at the time and perhaps this is as good a representation as will ever be
found.
The dye was considered very important and at one stage the bonnets taken to
Balmossie Mill for “Waulking” or fulling were returned in sealed bags. These were
opened and examined by the examiners appointed by the Trade. Any whose
colour was below standard was retained and given to the poor of the Craft and
the Master responsible fined for producing them. Standards had to be kept high.
Coarse wool, bought as fleece was carded and spun in the house and dyed in
the outside yard. The oldest dye recorded was woad, often imported from Dieppe
or Bordeaux. Later, when the West Indies trade developed, indigo was preferred.
Indigo came in the form of hard blocks, which were ground down, made into a
powder and put in a tub of urine, where it matured for some days before the wool
was added and the whole lot boiled until the colour was strong and fast. It must
be assumed that it was not only the colour that was strong, particularly in summer.
The use of Birsall (possibly from Brazil wood) was cheaper, but caused complaints
from the Magistrates and Council. Because the colour was so weak Birsall
was outlawed and was the reason for the bags from Balmossie Mill, where the
bonnets were fulled, being examined. Bonnetmakers, by an Act of Council, were
permitted to dye their own bonnets and were not required to use the services of
the Dyer Craft. This caused the Dyers great distress and helps to account for
their low numbers.
The main worry about the quality of the colour was not only because the Town
Council retained control over the quality of workmanship of every Trade, but because
the folk living in “Rottenrow”, as the Hilltown area was known, found it very
easy to knit bonnets and smuggle them into the burgh for sale undercutting the
official price. Hilltown was eventually swallowed up by Dundee and latterly all the
bonnet makers worked there, hence the name Bonnethill, as it was known by the
locals.
The Bonnetmaker Craft was one of the few Crafts who allowed women into
their ranks. These women were not allowed to become Masters in their
own right or have any say in the running of the Craft, but as far as can be
ascertained were wives or widows of masters. Several times an apprentice would
be entered as serving the Master and his wife or whichever of them outlived the
other.
Job sharing, too, was quite common, with agreements specifically detailed. For
example: -”March 26, 1683. - James Carnigy hathe agried with Elspit Hog for
one quarter year’s servic, week about wt James Gibson, her fie is two pond
Scots; her wekly task is sixtine gryt bonets, working or spining at eightine once
the pic; if ye bonet be less working the yarn is to be deliwrid bak wt the bonet,
and if the bonet be mor then 18 ounc working, she is to reseawe spun yarn to
our wead it, two dosn of the six pond sort at twelf ounc the pic, and two dozn and
eight of the four pond sort at 8 ounc the pic.” “July 13, 1691. - Elspit Smith and
James Gib hath agried with Margret Gib, her doghtar-in-lawe, and the said
James, her brother, for ean year’s serwice week about; hie fie is 5 pound Scots
money; her tesk is too her mother-in-lawe 32 litell bonets wickly, and too her
brother James 32 litell bonets, 24 midlen, 16 mickall, all this to be observed in
time of working.”
The volume of work expected from servants was quite remarkable.
By around 1700 the Dundee Bonnetmakers were already in trouble. It would appear
that they had not been ambitious enough and the Trade had been slowly
slipping away from them to Stewarton, who were very successful at marketing
their wares.
By the early 18th century things were changing rapidly and the Dundee Bonnetmakers
failed to change quickly enough to survive. An extract from the Town
Council Minutes of 13th October 1725 states ...... “the Bonnet makers were demanding
ane act to be added discharging ye Taylors from making cloath Bonnets
for prejudizing ye Bonnet Makers, if the Council thought fit to grant the same; -
which Act and Report being considered by the Council, they disapprove of the
foresaid addition demanded by ye bonnet makers.” The writing was on the wall
and the end could not be far away, more particularly because the men of Stewarton
were marketing their wares successfully to the army, which of course was
the biggest market available.
In 1726 “Glasgow Bonnets” as they were known were finding their way into
Dundee. The Craft realised that they were being bought by their own members
and being sold as being made by them. After all, by law, only goods made in the
Burgh could be sold from the Market Booths and only then after they had been
shown to the Bailies at the Mercat Cross, where taxes were collected. The Trade
therefore decreed that anyone discovered selling these bonnets would be fined
three pounds for the first offence and double for every further offence. This was
a swingeing fine and must have, at the very least, driven the trade underground.
This was also covered by forbidding any member to trade with another who had
been caught out selling Glasgow Bonnets.
The use of a Mortcloth was a valuable source of income for the Trade. In 1682 a
new one was purchased and shown to the Masters. Rules were formulated saying
that the cloth could only be used on a hard coffin. The new cloth could not be
used at night. The old cloth was to be used at night and the new one delivered
for daytime use at 8 a.m. Finally only well behaved members and those who had
always paid their dues on time could have it’s use. Even when dead, the Trade
still had a hold over you.
There is no record that ‘slip coffins’ were used by the Craft. These were coffins
with a hinged bottom, like a double door. As the coffin was lowered, a string was
pulled opening the door. The body would slip out and the coffin removed for use
at another funeral.
In 1590, Masters were condemned and punished for “playing in the fields at time
of preaching”.
In 1665 a fine of Forty shillings was imposed if any Master transgressed on a
Sunday, particularly if he was found drinking in a public house during the Service.
Breaking the Sabbath was again condemned in 1684. Masters were given a list
of fines for things like laying out their bonnets to dry, laying their clothes out to
dry, hanging their fish out to dry, carrying water from the well, washing their meat,
or visiting their neighbours, and particularly the taking of ale during the time of
the service. If however the wife was in travail, or her children or elderly folk were
sick, that would be accepted as good reason for these misdemeanours.
Misbehaved Masters were always punished regularly. In 1686 David Barclay “one
of our most misbehaved and ill disposed brothers of Craft” had been censured
and fined several times. Finally, having confessed to scandalous behaviour and
ill neighbourhood, swore that both he and his family would behave in future and
was again fined, but in addition a scale of fines for himself and his family was
laid down, partly depending on exactly who was insulted. For example, insulting
the Deacon cost four times as much as insulting an ordinary Member. If he was
found guilty twice, he would be banished from the Craft. In other words he could
no longer work and sell his own goods.Not only would this mean that he would
be unemployable but the minuisters of the parish would not helpsuch a reprobate,
leaving him and his family destitute. Life was hard indeed making such punishments
even more effective and enhancing the power and authority of the Deacon,
Boxmaster and Council of the Trade.
The last working Bonnetmaker, Adam Hill Stirton, from the Wellgate was entered
into the Craft in 1796 and died at home in the Hilltown just before his hundredth
birthday in 1848.
The oath taken by the new Master was similar to that of all the other Crafts (They
were presumably written by the Clergy) and had great religious significance.
However in September 1797, one Alex. Robertson refused to take this oath and
promised only “declaring as an honest man, to be a peaceable member of society,
and of his Craft, to promote the interests of this Craft, and of the widow and
orphan belonging thereto, and to do nothing prejudicial thereto, and to endeavour
to make concord where discord is”.
This was accepted by the Craft. The original oath was never used again and this
is the form of words used by men entering the Trade today.
In 1819 only one Bonnetmaker was left in the Craft. The Nine Trades were fighting
hard for Reform of the Burgh, mainly due to the corruption of the self-electing
councils, and partly through the domination by Provost Alexander Riddoch who
had controlled the burgh, mostly for his own ends, for 40 years. Because the
Bonnetmaker Craft sided with Riddoch (the sole remaining Bonnetmaker being
one of the Council ‘Junta’ as the Trades called Riddoch’s cronies), the Nine
Trades claimed that because of their small numbers, they should not have a
Trades vote in these affairs. The Guildry also complained bitterly about the Bonnetmakers.
The Bonnetmakers answer was to enact that that they could enlist
paying, but non-operative members, so that they could have a membership large
enough to claim proper representation in the Nine Trades deliberations and retain
their seat on the Town Council.
That squabble made the Bonnetmakers the first “open “ Craft and undoubtedly
saved them as a Craft today, albeit as a social and charitable organisation with
no Craft members.
Today the membership is strongly representative of the professions, as well as
the business community. The legal, medical and accountancy professions are
very much at home as Bonnetmakers, and the craft now has by far the largest
membership of all.
Several of the Earls of Airlie, including the present Earl were welcomed into the
Craft. Dukes of Atholl, the Earl of Camperdown and the Duke of Gloucester are
among the famous names recorded as Honorary Members.
In 1902, Andrew Carnegie, the famous philanthropist became an Honorary member.
The present Seal of the Craft was specially designed and made for that ceremony.
The Seal was first used on the Certificate given to him at that time, and
as a gesture he presented the craft with a 1,000 Dollar Gold Bond of the United
Steel Corporation.
The Duke of Kent became an Honorary member in 1933, when 171 Bonnetmaker’s
attended the ceremony. The Trade presented him and his wife Princess
Marina with a gate-leg table on the occasion of their marriage.
On 30th July 1904, Sir James Ritchie, a Dundonian and the then Lord Mayor of
London, joined the Craft. A photograph commemorating the admission is in the
keeping of the Clerk.
he staff still carried by the Deacon today is now over 200 years old. It was presented
to the Craft by Peter Reid of Leslie in 1905. It was described at that time
as the staff “used by the Deacons 100 years ago”
In 1938, Thomas Winton, a Bonnetmker, presented the Gavel used at Meetings
of the Craft to the craft. It is made of walnut from a tree planted in the grounds of
Balmerino Abbey around 1566 by Mary of Guise, wife of James V and mother of
Mary Queen of Scots. The tree had been blown down in a gale in 1935. Much of
the wood went to line Government Buildings in Whitehall, but a chair made from
the same tree was presented to Dundee Public Library and is presently in the
keeping of the McManus Galleries.
In 1968 at the formation of the new Dundee University a bonnet was presented
by the Craft, which has on it their crest, hand-embroidered by the wife of past
Deacon Sibbald. This bonnet is used at all ‘Capping’ Ceremonies of students on
their graduation from the University.
A similar presentation was made when Dundee College of Technology was upgraded
to Abertay University.
The Craft meets regularly, takes part in all the Nine Trades business and has
produced many Deacon Conveners of the Nine Incorporated Trades of Dundee.
Presently the largest of the Crafts, it has survived by changing to fit the times.
The Bonnetmaker Craft had proved to be the nautral home for Dundee citizens
working in the fields of Medicine, Law and Accountancy among many others in
the business community. The Craft can only survive by being relevant in the world
of today and the energy and enthusiasm shown by the members with regard to
its educational and charitable work is as important to the City today as it has
been for over 500 years. There may be no operative Bonnetmakers left, but the
spirit of the Craft will last as long as the Members find that they can be of service
to the City of Dundee.